The article I posted here talks a little about what is involved in food animal production.Quote:
Originally Posted by CA_in_NC
Printable View
The article I posted here talks a little about what is involved in food animal production.Quote:
Originally Posted by CA_in_NC
I've taken this before and my results are a little different now: I am eating more dairy than I used to, but we are also working really hard to eat more locally-grown unprocessed foods. And I drive even less than I did a couple of years ago (when I drove about 10 miles a week to night classes).
When I took the quiz before, I seem to remember that someone fudged around with answers and determined that the place you live affects your score -- there is a point where you personally can't change the outcome, just because of your location. Which doesn't mean the results are invalid; I think the point is really to make people in developed countries aware of how many more resources we use even when we try to be ecologically careful.Quote:
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 3.2
MOBILITY 0.5
SHELTER 3.5
GOODS/SERVICES 2.7
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 10
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.2 PLANETS.
Just having electricity and running water means we are using more resources than people who don't have those things. Doesn't mean we should start hauling water from the rivers and posting on TE by candlelight ;) ... just that we should be aware of how relatively privileged we are to have access to all of these resources, and maybe to not take them for granted.
I was disappointed with my results (vegetarian, drive a high mileage car, energy efficient house), but, alas, I live in a Northern clime and drive/fly too much.
But....has anyone figured out, yet, how to hook up our trianers to a generator? Shouldn't I be able to lurk at TE for free with the amount of spinning I do to ECT? :-)
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 4
MOBILITY 0.5
SHELTER 4.7
GOODS/SERVICES 3.5
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 13
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.8 PLANETS.
I guess the fact that I live in a small home, don't own a car, so usually take bike or public transportation or even walk to the grocery for small things kept my numbers somewhat down.
That's a very interesting article. I guess what surprised me is that it doesn't seem to have made a difference that I've cut out all beef and pork, and only eat meat at all on an occasional basis (1-2 times per week). Just having occasional meat in any form (for me, chicken or fish), and milk/cheese was enough to put me in one of the highest categories.Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen
I stopped eating beef not too long after reading about the load on the earth (and I had some other very personal reasons). Same for pork.
Interesting....
I have work to do. :(
FOOD: 5.4
MOBILITY: 0.2
SHELTER: 4
GOODS/SERVICES: 3.7
TOTAL FOOTPRINT: 13
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3 PLANETS.
I have done this before too and my score is quite high. The main culprit is flying. Adds huge amounts of points, but is the only feasible way to see family...what to do? If only they would open a railway bridge from Siberia to Alaska. I would take the train to see Trek420 and the rest of the family....
you could kayak :rolleyes:
There are different sites that offer "carbon offsetting" that is pay $___ ammount into technologies that offset the damage we do each day.
I don't have the money to simply say "Here, take this, now I feel less guilty" but I do have some to invest.
With the company profit share next month I plan to invest in companies that are finding ways to reduce our footprint. That way I'm saving, even maybe earning :o
I see I have the highest score -- by a lot -- of anyone posting here. :(
I do have a long drive to work (29 miles each way), but other than that I am not really sure why. I eat meat a few times a week but lots of veggie dishes, hardly ever fly (once per year, if that); but yes, I do have running water, electricity, and live in a 2100 sq ft house -- not large by US standards, but palatial by world standards, I am sure. I am not sure what else might have caused my score to be so high. I recycle, shop at the farmer's market and food co-op (though that's probably only 50% of my food), use compact flurescents....where did I go wrong?? :confused:
Emily
P.S. I'd be willing to bet most of my co-workers would score higher than me -- they all think of me as "super green". Ha!
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.2
MOBILITY 3.2
SHELTER 4.7
GOODS/SERVICES 7.2
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 20
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.6 PLANETS
Yikes! I guess I'd better make some changes.
Emily-
Looks like I'm nailed because I'm not vegan, live in an 1800 square foot condo and drive 35 miles each way to work.
I really think they nail you (rightly or wrongly) for eating any meat and consuming any dairy products. That and the house size are what got me.
I really wonder whether this really takes everything into account:cool: We do the same - all compact fluorescents, just replaced our furnace for more efficiency, turn off lights when we're not home, and keep the thermostat high in summer and low in winter. That and we bike everywhere we can. I'm not sure any of that really shows up in the survey. Still....it does give food for thought....
Edit: I ran my number with a 2100 square foot home for 2 people and that kicked me up to 29.
The FAQ: http://www.rprogress.org/newprojects...html#accuracy1
This actually tells you a lot about the assumptions made in the footprint, and explains that some is based upon your area, not your habits.
CA
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 3.5
MOBILITY 1
SHELTER 6.7
GOODS/SERVICES 5.2
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 16
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3.7 PLANETS.
ok... so... crap. oops. My biggies were probably flying, eating meat (even occasionally?!) etc. I almost totally cut out eggs and dairy and have meat more often than either but they don't account for that. My shelter one sucks because I live alone... and 'g/s' is figured to be proportionate to the above 3. *however* my electric bill is <$100/mo, I use very little water etc (generally... :p :o ) and I always recycle... Grr. Oh and I need to get my vermiculture box going again. I was so happy having my own compost in my own garden.
OK, mine is pretty bad. I'll have to read more to find out why.
CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES
FOOD 2.8
MOBILITY 0.7
SHELTER 2.1
GOODS/SERVICES 2.9
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 8.5
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 8.8 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.7 PLANETS.
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 3.7
MOBILITY 1
SHELTER 4.2
GOODS/SERVICES 4.7
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 14
would need 3.1 planets. :(