Thanks. I work out.* :)
Karen
*which means it's not an accident that I think that way, and attitude is everything.
Printable View
Thanks. I work out.* :)
Karen
*which means it's not an accident that I think that way, and attitude is everything.
Hold the phone.... I don't think you meant you were a size 16-18 in shoes, right?? :rolleyes:
I'm an 11 in shoes. ;) I was a 10 before I had my daughter and went up a full size. 11 is tough enough, but if I were to have another kid, I'd have to shop at the drag queen stores for shoes.
You can't compare today's sizing with that of 30 or more years ago. Vanity sizing has completely changed everything. A size 10 of the 60s is about a 6 now. There are 2 exceptions: Bridal wear and pattern sizing. Next time you go by a Joann's or Hancock's, go in, pull a pattern and look at the measurements for various sizes. They are still true to the original American sizing system.
Does anybody remember when blouses were sized 30, 32, 34, etc?
You're exactly right. Back then there was no need for a size zero or (gasp) double zero! :eek: I have to admit to liking the modern sizing better, but they can't keep making sizes larger and larger lest the tiniest women start needing negative sizes! :D
Emily
Luckily, I like my size 10-12-14-16-18's baggy enough that when my weight fluctuates, my clothes still mostly fit.
Nanci