Arkansas= worst
Washington = best
http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/23/living...html?hpt=hp_t2
Wish it named all the states in order.
Printable View
Arkansas= worst
Washington = best
http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/23/living...html?hpt=hp_t2
Wish it named all the states in order.
Here's the full list:
http://www.bikeleague.org/programs/b...e/rankings.php
http://www.bikeleague.org/programs/b...friendlystate/
My state is listed as number 30.
...And as I suspected, we're near the bottom. Sigh.
My home state is 6. My current state is 19.
My state is No. 14.
The criteria ranged "from laws and regulations that govern bicycling to policies for accommodating cyclists and infrastructure funding."
I wish Arizona had what Washington has: it "is considered a model for all other states on using federal funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects. It also earned points for adopting a safe passing and vulnerable road user law, which carries enhanced penalties for motorists who severely injure or kill a cyclist or pedestrian, Wempe said. It also creates a minimum 3-foot 'safe passing' distance for cyclists by motorists.
"The state also has a 'complete streets' policy, which means new roads must be designed with cyclists and pedestrians in mind, Wempe said."
We have the weather, but not the infrastructure. I was thrilled when the construction project on Scottsdale Road was finally finished and there were actually BIKE LANES. Then I rode there, and the bike lanes appear and disappear at random.
Sheesh, don't get me started.
Indiana is 30 while my home state is 26...something of a surprise as I wouldn't have thought Tennessee would rank higher. Sounds like I need to pay attention when I go home.
Michigan would have to be the worst, regardless of what the chart says. After all, at one high school in this state kids get suspended for riding their bikes to school!
Granted, I've only ridden in Tennesse during organized tours or event rides, but I've always really enjoyed my rides there and have never encountered any problems, and I've been in some pretty remote areas. I'd much rather ride there than in Indiana for sure. If nothing else, the roads themselves are a heck of a lot nicer.
Good for Minnesota at number 2!
Minneapolis and St. Paul have untold number of bike paths but they sure can be crowded on a nice day. The riders far exceed the speed limit on the path so you really have to be alert as people weave in and out.
Would be a different view if they took into account accidents, fatalities, perception and the ability to ride one's bike in each state. Policy's up the wazoo don't necessarily equate to better cycling but that is just my opinion. I have heard Louisiana has the worst fatality rate but can't remember which cycling organization posted that.
Thanks for the information Indy, I've not rode in my home state and the roads are indeed a LOT nicer than here! Hopefully the next time I go home I will be able to take my Gunnar and check out the riding in East Tennessee :)
Zoom - I saw her apology - can't imagine what she was originally thinking. I am sure she apologized for all of the wrong reasons but at least she did.
The fact that Florida is perennially rated so high, makes the whole thing suspect IMO. I've never ridden anywhere so hostile to cyclists, from road design, to driver behavior, to the law that says you have to ride on bike paths, to refusal to prosecute drivers for killing cyclists.
Amen. I don't think this list is based on actual bike friendliness at all. Nebraska is 43rd on the list, but at least in/around Omaha we have oodles of commuter bikers everywhere, kiosks all over to rent bikes, an awesome trail system, etc. And I've heard nothing but awful scary things out of Florida. My uncle, who's ridden the "long way" across every state (and Canadian province...and the African Continent...) made an exception for Florida due to safety. He only rode on little part across.