Kalidurga
09-08-2006, 06:36 PM
velonews.com: Landis attorney seeks dismissal (http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10835.0.html)
'Floyd Landis's attorney Howard Jacobs said Wednesday that he intends to request the dismissal of the doping case against client based on "inconsistencies in the testing protocol and methodology" used to show that the 2006 Tour de France was positive for testosterone...
... In a press release issued Friday, Jacobs's office noted that upon "review of 370 pages of documentation provided by the LNDD laboratory at Chatenay-Malabry, Jacobs and a team of scientific experts have found inconsistencies in the testing protocol and methodology that support Landis' innocence. Jacobs received the official document package on August 31."
"In our review of the documents detailing the tests on both the ‘A' and ‘B' sample, we have found evidence that supports our request for USADA to drop the doping charges against Landis," said Jacobs. "While I cannot comment on the full details of our findings, we now have the foundation for a very strong defense should the case proceed to arbitration." '
I just can't wait to see how Diminutive-for-Richard Pound responds to this...
'Floyd Landis's attorney Howard Jacobs said Wednesday that he intends to request the dismissal of the doping case against client based on "inconsistencies in the testing protocol and methodology" used to show that the 2006 Tour de France was positive for testosterone...
... In a press release issued Friday, Jacobs's office noted that upon "review of 370 pages of documentation provided by the LNDD laboratory at Chatenay-Malabry, Jacobs and a team of scientific experts have found inconsistencies in the testing protocol and methodology that support Landis' innocence. Jacobs received the official document package on August 31."
"In our review of the documents detailing the tests on both the ‘A' and ‘B' sample, we have found evidence that supports our request for USADA to drop the doping charges against Landis," said Jacobs. "While I cannot comment on the full details of our findings, we now have the foundation for a very strong defense should the case proceed to arbitration." '
I just can't wait to see how Diminutive-for-Richard Pound responds to this...