plantluvver
07-13-2006, 03:42 PM
Ok,
My idea of a bike is basically the frame. In my mind, any two different frames should have different names, except maybe for differences due to sizing different people.
I am looking at The Specialized Sequoia. Sequoia has a "A1 Premium Aluminum" frame. Sequoia Elite has an "E5 Columbus SLX frame." Both these descriptions are pretty much gibberish to me, except that they are DIFFERENT while the bike model has the same name. So what does a manufacturer mean by a model? Is it a particular frame geometry? Or is it a market or function they are trying to serve? Or are they trying to satisfy the "label-conscious" individual who wants a certain bike they have heard of, so they try to please the buyer by making a cheaper "wanna-be" version? Or does making deciscions like this merely keep the marketing department busy?
Can one of the Sequoias actually be more like another bike in the product line than her sister?
As far as frame materials, I would think that two materials would require a different geometry, because they must behave differently. For that matter, can different frame sizes create different performance within a single model. Say that a stiff reacing bike that works nimbly for a tall guy, is sized down for small woman. I imagine it could become very skittish, so are the designs adjusted to try to compensate? I imagine that this is more of an art than a science, because something like tubing thicknessess cannot be changed, wheel sizes must be standard, etc.
Any bike designers/marketers out there to shed any light on this?
Mary
My idea of a bike is basically the frame. In my mind, any two different frames should have different names, except maybe for differences due to sizing different people.
I am looking at The Specialized Sequoia. Sequoia has a "A1 Premium Aluminum" frame. Sequoia Elite has an "E5 Columbus SLX frame." Both these descriptions are pretty much gibberish to me, except that they are DIFFERENT while the bike model has the same name. So what does a manufacturer mean by a model? Is it a particular frame geometry? Or is it a market or function they are trying to serve? Or are they trying to satisfy the "label-conscious" individual who wants a certain bike they have heard of, so they try to please the buyer by making a cheaper "wanna-be" version? Or does making deciscions like this merely keep the marketing department busy?
Can one of the Sequoias actually be more like another bike in the product line than her sister?
As far as frame materials, I would think that two materials would require a different geometry, because they must behave differently. For that matter, can different frame sizes create different performance within a single model. Say that a stiff reacing bike that works nimbly for a tall guy, is sized down for small woman. I imagine it could become very skittish, so are the designs adjusted to try to compensate? I imagine that this is more of an art than a science, because something like tubing thicknessess cannot be changed, wheel sizes must be standard, etc.
Any bike designers/marketers out there to shed any light on this?
Mary