indysteel
07-02-2010, 08:50 AM
Another TEer has inspired my DH and I to do an end-to-end tour of the Katy Trail. We're thinking of September of next year. As you might guess, :rolleyes: the ride is giving us a good excuse to buy touring bikes. We have road bikes that aren't perfectly suited for the packed limestone of the Katy. At least, that's our rationalization!
My DH already has a Jamis, so he''s pretty sold on the 2010 Aurora in blue. I'm also looking at the 47 cm Aurora in green. Zen mentioned in another thread (Catrin's Surly versus Aurora thread) that it has "unique" geometry, but she didn't really elaborate on what makes it unique.
I happily ride a 50 cm Bianchi Eros Donna, which also has somewhat unique geometry. In comparing the two bikes I tend to think they're comparable, so I'm hoping the Aurora work. Ideally, I'll find a shop that has it in stock for me to try, but if not, I'd like to hear anybody else's take on it.
I'd add that I'm a little gun shy to buy a new bike. Last year, I invested a ton of time, money and energy into another frame--a custom Moots--that ultimately didn't work for me. The Moots is pretty similar to the Bianchi except for a shorter top tube and a steeper head tube. On paper, it should work....but it just doesn't. :(
In trying in vain to get the Moots to work for me, I realized a couple things. I need a slacker seat tube than a lot of bikes that are otherwise my size. It appears that most smaller frams have STAs of 74.5 to 75 degrees. They work for me--so long as I have a seatpost with A LOT of set back and even then, I have to push my saddle back nearly all the way. The Aurora has a 74 degree SA, so I'm hopeful in that department.
I also prefer to have a longer top tube than my measurements would otherwise suggest. I tend to think the Moots is just too cramped for me in this regard. The Bianchi's ETT is 515; the Aurora's is 513. Finally, I have a short inseam. The Bianchi's standover is 28.7, and that's about my limit. The Aurora's standover for the 47 cm is less than that, so I should be okay.
If anybody had any thoughts after seeing those numbers, let me know.
Thanks!
My DH already has a Jamis, so he''s pretty sold on the 2010 Aurora in blue. I'm also looking at the 47 cm Aurora in green. Zen mentioned in another thread (Catrin's Surly versus Aurora thread) that it has "unique" geometry, but she didn't really elaborate on what makes it unique.
I happily ride a 50 cm Bianchi Eros Donna, which also has somewhat unique geometry. In comparing the two bikes I tend to think they're comparable, so I'm hoping the Aurora work. Ideally, I'll find a shop that has it in stock for me to try, but if not, I'd like to hear anybody else's take on it.
I'd add that I'm a little gun shy to buy a new bike. Last year, I invested a ton of time, money and energy into another frame--a custom Moots--that ultimately didn't work for me. The Moots is pretty similar to the Bianchi except for a shorter top tube and a steeper head tube. On paper, it should work....but it just doesn't. :(
In trying in vain to get the Moots to work for me, I realized a couple things. I need a slacker seat tube than a lot of bikes that are otherwise my size. It appears that most smaller frams have STAs of 74.5 to 75 degrees. They work for me--so long as I have a seatpost with A LOT of set back and even then, I have to push my saddle back nearly all the way. The Aurora has a 74 degree SA, so I'm hopeful in that department.
I also prefer to have a longer top tube than my measurements would otherwise suggest. I tend to think the Moots is just too cramped for me in this regard. The Bianchi's ETT is 515; the Aurora's is 513. Finally, I have a short inseam. The Bianchi's standover is 28.7, and that's about my limit. The Aurora's standover for the 47 cm is less than that, so I should be okay.
If anybody had any thoughts after seeing those numbers, let me know.
Thanks!