zia
09-22-2009, 11:57 AM
So... Runner's World magazine (August 09) has a nice beginner half marathon training schedule. *Nice* for me because it includes two x-training workouts per week. I am very injury prone, so have switched to triathlons, so this would work nearly perfectly as an off-season goal.
Except... I'd really like three days of running and three days of x-training (2 bike, 1 swim, and then 2 swim, 1 bike the next week). It's a 10 week schedule. Would there be any disadvantage to extending the schedule to 13 weeks and doing the 3 run/3 x-train? It would be nearly the same number of workouts with less weekly mileage.
The only issue I can think of is that a 13-week training plan might be a tad long... but the lower running frequency should balance that, no? I should add that I haven't been able to run over 6 miles without pain since 1990. But I think if I build up gradually it should be able to do it.
Probably over analyzing... need outside perspective...
Except... I'd really like three days of running and three days of x-training (2 bike, 1 swim, and then 2 swim, 1 bike the next week). It's a 10 week schedule. Would there be any disadvantage to extending the schedule to 13 weeks and doing the 3 run/3 x-train? It would be nearly the same number of workouts with less weekly mileage.
The only issue I can think of is that a 13-week training plan might be a tad long... but the lower running frequency should balance that, no? I should add that I haven't been able to run over 6 miles without pain since 1990. But I think if I build up gradually it should be able to do it.
Probably over analyzing... need outside perspective...