ladyjai
12-02-2006, 06:46 AM
I think it was denise who had the setup with her DSLR on a rack on the back of her bike friday?
Anyway, I'm looking at a similar setup. I like the fact that being on a rack puts it in a little safer place than on the cyclist body and I dont have to worry about weight positioning, but i'm concerned about the road jostles. sometimes the road just rattles and rottles. I know that things on my body tend to be protected from much of the jostling, but does that make a big deal? I'm looking at getting a Nikon D50 for taking photos. It's work related, and the camera will be riding my bike for long saturdays. easily getting 50-100 miles a saturday. I'd rather not shorten camera life because of racking. so please, talk to me and let me know how you have things working?
I never thought the rattle was so rough on things until i've had a certain rear light come off and be run over about 3 times by cars. but if i keep it on my body, it never falls off. obviously, the rack wont' come off, but there are electronic innerparts.
am I worrying for naught?
Anyway, I'm looking at a similar setup. I like the fact that being on a rack puts it in a little safer place than on the cyclist body and I dont have to worry about weight positioning, but i'm concerned about the road jostles. sometimes the road just rattles and rottles. I know that things on my body tend to be protected from much of the jostling, but does that make a big deal? I'm looking at getting a Nikon D50 for taking photos. It's work related, and the camera will be riding my bike for long saturdays. easily getting 50-100 miles a saturday. I'd rather not shorten camera life because of racking. so please, talk to me and let me know how you have things working?
I never thought the rattle was so rough on things until i've had a certain rear light come off and be run over about 3 times by cars. but if i keep it on my body, it never falls off. obviously, the rack wont' come off, but there are electronic innerparts.
am I worrying for naught?